Since Checkstyle 3.4
Checks if unnecessary parentheses are used in a statement or expression. The check will flag the following with warnings:
return (x); // parens around identifier
return (x + 1); // parens around return value
int x = (y / 2 + 1); // parens around assignment rhs
for (int i = (0); i < 10; i++) { // parens around literal
t -= (z + 1); // parens around assignment rhs
boolean a = (x > 7 && y > 5) // parens around expression
|| z < 9;
boolean b = (~a) > -27 // parens around ~a
&& (a-- < 30); // parens around expression
The check is not "type aware", that is to say, it can't tell if parentheses are unnecessary based on the types in an expression. The check is partially aware about operator precedence but unaware about operator associativity. It won't catch cases such as:
int x = (a + b) + c; // 1st Case
boolean p = true; // 2nd Case
int q = 4;
int r = 3;
if (p == (q <= r)) {}
In the first case, given that a, b, and c are all
int variables, the parentheses around a + b
are not needed.
In the second case, parentheses are required as q, r are
of type int and p is of type boolean
and removing parentheses will give a compile-time error. Even if q
and r were boolean still there will be no violation
raised as check is not "type aware".
The partial support for operator precedence includes cases of the following type:
boolean a = true, b = true;
boolean c = false, d = false;
if ((a && b) || c) { // violation, unnecessary paren
}
if (a && (b || c)) { // ok
}
if ((a == b) && c) { // violation, unnecessary paren
}
String e = "e";
if ((e instanceof String) && a || b) { // violation, unnecessary paren
}
int f = 0;
int g = 0;
if (!(f >= g) // ok
&& (g > f)) { // violation, unnecessary paren
}
if ((++f) > g && a) { // violation, unnecessary paren
}
To configure the check:
<module name="Checker">
<module name="TreeWalker">
<module name="UnnecessaryParentheses"/>
</module>
</module>
Which results in the following violations:
public int square(int a, int b){
int square = (a * b); // violation
return (square); // violation
}
int sumOfSquares = 0;
for(int i=(0); i<10; i++){ // violation
int x = (i + 1); // violation
sumOfSquares += (square(x * x)); // violation
}
double num = (10.0); //violation
List<String> list = Arrays.asList("a1", "b1", "c1");
myList.stream()
.filter((s) -> s.startsWith("c")) // violation
.forEach(System.out::println);
int a = 10, b = 12, c = 15;
boolean x = true, y = false, z= true;
if ((a >= 0 && b <= 9) // violation, unnecessary parenthesis
|| (c >= 5 && b <= 5) // violation, unnecessary parenthesis
|| (c >= 3 && a <= 7)) { // violation, unnecessary parenthesis
return;
}
if ((-a) != -27 // violation, unnecessary parenthesis
&& b > 5) {
return;
}
if (x==(a <= 15)) { // ok
return;
}
if (x==(y == z)) { // ok
return;
}
To configure the check to detect unnecessary parentheses around bitwise inclusive OR
'|' , bitwise AND '&' , bitwise exclusive OR
'^' :
<module name="Checker">
<module name="TreeWalker">
<module name="UnnecessaryParentheses">
<property name="tokens" value="BOR, BAND, BXOR" />
</module>
</module>
</module>
Example:
class Test {
void method() {
int x = 9, y = 8;
if(x>= 0 ^ (x<=8 & y<=11) // violation, unnecessary parenthesis
^ y>=8) {
return;
}
if(x>= 0 ^ x<=8 & y<=11 ^ y>=8) { // ok
return;
}
if(x>= 0 || (x<=8 & y<=11) // violation, unnecessary parenthesis
&& y>=8) {
return;
}
if(x>= 0 || x<=8 & y<=11 && y>=8) { // ok
return;
}
if(x>= 0 & (x<=8 ^ y<=11) & y>=8) { // ok
return;
}
}
}
All messages can be customized if the default message doesn't suit you. Please see the documentation to learn how to.
com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.checks.coding