Since Checkstyle 3.1
According to Bloch, an interface should describe a type. It is therefore inappropriate to define an interface that does not contain any methods but only constants. The Standard interface javax.swing.SwingConstants is an example of an interface that would be flagged by this check.
The check can be configured to also disallow marker interfaces like
java.io.Serializable
, that do not contain methods or
constants at all.
name | description | type | default value | since |
---|---|---|---|---|
allowMarkerInterfaces | Control whether marker interfaces like Serializable are allowed. | boolean | true |
3.1 |
To configure the check:
<module name="Checker"> <module name="TreeWalker"> <module name="InterfaceIsType"/> </module> </module>
Example:
class Example1 { // violation below, 'interfaces should describe a type and hence have methods.' interface Test1 { int a = 3; } // ok below, because marker interfaces are allowed by default. interface Test2 { } interface Test3 { // ok, because it has a method. int a = 3; void test(); } }
To configure the check to report violation so that it doesn't allow Marker Interfaces:
<module name="Checker"> <module name="TreeWalker"> <module name="InterfaceIsType"> <property name="allowMarkerInterfaces" value="false"/> </module> </module> </module>
Example:
class Example2 { // violation below, 'interfaces should describe a type and hence have methods.' interface Test1 { int a = 3; } // violation below, 'interfaces should describe a type and hence have methods.' interface Test2 { } interface Test3 { // ok, because it has a method. int a = 3; void test(); } }
All messages can be customized if the default message doesn't suit you. Please see the documentation to learn how to.
com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.checks.design